Lifecycle ‘significant issue’ for PFI review

31 May 2012 Lifecycle and the procurement process are the top considerations for the Treasury’s review of PFI, Partnerships Bulletin’s Big Five conference has heard.

Infrastructure UK’s cost review programme director, Alan Couzens, told delegates that these two elements had been “significant issues” in the responses received in the call for evidence, which closed in February.

 

There is a growing feeling that the lifecycle element of PPP deals will be dropped from the new model: in the recent announcement on the Priority School Building Programme, it was revealed that the maintenance of the new schools will remain with the public sector.

 

However, panellist Giles Frost, director at investor INPP, warned against removing lifecycle from future PFI deals altogether.

 

“If the government takes back lifecycle, it would end up with much more expensive buildings in the long-term, because they will not be maintained in the same way and will wear out more quickly,” he said.

 

Couzens also reiterated the Treasury’s position that the government is aiming to publish its response to the PFI review’s call for evidence before the summer recess.

This page was last updated on:
26 April 2016.

thumb

ESA Trouble

Could ESA10 really save PF2 – or even bring back PFI?

House of Funds

Michael Ryan formed Dalmore Capital just when the economy and the PPP pipeline was flatlining. He tells Amanda Nicholls how the fund manager has come out the other side

register

Register now to get un-restricted access to all sections of the website.

Want to see more first? Try our free preview...