Lifecycle ‘significant issue’ for PFI review

31 May 2012 Lifecycle and the procurement process are the top considerations for the Treasury’s review of PFI, Partnerships Bulletin’s Big Five conference has heard.

Infrastructure UK’s cost review programme director, Alan Couzens, told delegates that these two elements had been “significant issues” in the responses received in the call for evidence, which closed in February.

 

There is a growing feeling that the lifecycle element of PPP deals will be dropped from the new model: in the recent announcement on the Priority School Building Programme, it was revealed that the maintenance of the new schools will remain with the public sector.

 

However, panellist Giles Frost, director at investor INPP, warned against removing lifecycle from future PFI deals altogether.

 

“If the government takes back lifecycle, it would end up with much more expensive buildings in the long-term, because they will not be maintained in the same way and will wear out more quickly,” he said.

 

Couzens also reiterated the Treasury’s position that the government is aiming to publish its response to the PFI review’s call for evidence before the summer recess.

This page was last updated on:
4 May 2015.

thumb

Softly spoken

For all the high-viz jackets and hard hats, the parties’ manifestos are short on any new infrastructure plans

thumb

The long road

There is a huge need for Afghan PPPs, explains Alessandro Abati, PPP Expert at the Afghan Ministry of Finance

register

Register now to get un-restricted access to all sections of the website.

Want to see more first? Try our free preview...