15 October 2019


2 April 2014

Left hand, meet right hand

The Budget’s proposed changes to pension funds appear to run completely counter to the government’s objective of increasing institutional investment in infrastructure
It was an announcement aimed squarely at capturing the powerful ‘grey vote’. Just over a year out from the election, and with Labour making headway with some popular pledges such as a freeze on energy prices, Chancellor George Osborne pulled the rabbit from the hat by announcing that in future, pension holders would be allowed to draw down their entire pension pot in one go.

Politically, the move was a masterstroke. Labour struggled to come up with a response – oppose it and they faced being labelled nanny-staters who would not trust people with their own money. Support it, of course, and they would find themselves in the politically difficult position of applauding their rivals for something they had not even considered.

Economically, though, the decision may fall far short of the masterstroke that many in the blue camp have been talking it up as.

Less than a fortnight after the announcement, ratings agency Moody’s had made up its mind on the impact of the decision on the UK’s pension companies. The outlook for some of the biggest companies – including Prudential UK, Legal & General and Aviva Life & Pensions UK – was cut amid concerns over the likely short-term effect of the changes to pensions policy.

“While the changes introduced in the budget may ultimately encourage future savings into pension products, the short-term impact will likely be a significant reduction in sales volumes and margins in the UK individual annuity market, a key driver of future profitability for many insurers,” said Moody’s in its statement.

The agency suggested that the changes could drive individual annuity new business sales down by between 50%-75% of their current level over the near-to-medium term.

All this matters significantly to the UK infrastructure market, because these are just the sort of companies that the government has been trying to entice to invest more money in the sector. If new business is about to fall off a cliff, and the firms’ ratings are being cut, suddenly there may not be a whole lot of money available to invest after all.

Given that in December, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander was welcoming promises of new investment from the insurance industry as a signal of the government’s efforts to open up the infrastructure market to institutional investors, Osborne’s Budget giveaway seems even more surprising.

Cynics will say that the left hand simply does not know what the right hand is trying to achieve within Treasury. If that is the case, it must surely be about time the two at least met to let each other know what they are working on.


If you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the headline, link and introduction below:

Left hand, meet right hand


The Budget’s proposed changes to pension funds appear to run completely counter to the government’s objective of increasing institutional investment in infrastructure

Copy to clipboard

If you would like to buy a subscription for more people to access our website, or are interested in being granted a licence to reproduce our content, please contact Amanda Nicholls:

+44 (0)20 8675 8030


Free preview

Register now to get un-restricted access to all sections of the website.

Want to see more first? Try our free preview...

Register now

Most Read

  1. Enough is enough
  2. Play Time
  3. The end of the affair
  4. In search of the Brits
  5. Heating up
  6. Not banking on it
Log in
Your email address and/or password were not recognised. Please check and try again.
Your subscription has now expired. To renew your subscription, please call our subscription team on +44 (0)20 8675 7770 or email subscriptions@partnershipsbulletin.com